On the latest episode of Google's Search Off the Record podcast, which surfaced around 23 June 2026, two of the engineers whose whole job is how search reads the web pushed back on an idea that has been spreading fast: that a business should build a second, stripped-down copy of its website, written in plain markdown, purely for AI engines to read. John Mueller and Martin Splitt, both from Google's Search Relations team, gave it a blunt verdict. Do not bother.
That matters because a small industry has grown up selling exactly this. The pitch sounds modern and reassuring: AI is the new way customers find you, so you need an AI ready version of your site, a machine friendly mirror, often bundled with a special file that is supposed to hand the AI a tidy menu of your pages. Plenty of Australian owners are being quoted real money for it right now, on the promise that it gets them cited by ChatGPT, Google's AI answers and the rest. The two people at Google closest to how this actually works just said the extra version is more likely to cost you than help you.
It is worth being precise, because this is easy to overstate. Nobody at Google said AI search does not matter, and nobody said your site does not need to be readable by machines. The opposite is true. What they cautioned against is the specific shortcut of running a separate, parallel copy of your content for the bots, instead of making the real site good enough to read on its own.
What Google actually pushed back on
The reasoning is the kind of plain engineering wisdom that is easy to nod along to and easy to ignore when someone is selling you the opposite. Splitt made the obvious point that a markdown copy throws away everything that makes a real page work for a human: the layout, the images, the design that helps a customer understand and trust you. Mueller's warning was sharper and aimed straight at the maintenance trap. The moment you keep two versions of your content, everything gets more complex, and the machine facing copy breaks silently. A broken page that customers see gets reported within the hour. A broken AI copy sits there rotting, telling engines the wrong thing about your business, and no user is ever going to tell you it happened.
Read that last part twice, because it is the whole risk in one line. The failure is invisible. You pay to build the second version, you feel modern for having it, and then it quietly drifts out of date the first time you change a price or add a service, feeding stale or wrong information into the exact channel you built it to win.
Why the shortcut is so tempting, and so risky
The appeal is understandable. AI search feels like a brand new front door, so a brand new AI version of your site feels like the right response to it. It is also a tidy thing to sell: concrete, technical sounding, easy to put a price on. But it asks you to maintain two truths about your business and hope they never disagree. Technical SEO specialists have spent the past year pouring cold water on the idea that a special file or a separate copy is the magic key to AI visibility. Aleyda Solis, one of the most respected voices on technical and AI search, is among those who keep returning to the same unglamorous point: the engines reward the fundamentals done well, not a clever side door built to game them.
This is the same instinct that makes block everything the wrong answer to AI crawlers, the subject we covered when we wrote about which AI bots read your website. The reflex to do something dramatic and technical is strong. The move that actually pays off is usually quieter, more boring, and harder to fake.
What actually earns the citation
AI engines read your real pages. When ChatGPT or Google's AI answer names a business, it is drawing on the open, public version of that business across the web, weighted heavily toward sites it has reason to trust. So the work that gets you mentioned is the same work that has always made a site genuinely good, now with the bar raised, because a machine reading you literally cannot make the generous assumptions a patient human would. This is the heart of getting found by AI in the first place, and it has nothing to do with a shadow copy. Here is what good looks like once it is set up properly:
- There is one authoritative version of the truth about your business, not a public site and a secret machine copy quietly disagreeing with each other.
- Your key facts, the services you offer, your prices, your hours, your locations, are structured cleanly enough that a machine reads them without guessing.
- Your content reads as genuinely expert and first hand, because that is exactly what AI engines are told to reward when they decide who to name.
- The site is fast and clean enough that a crawler can actually read all of it, rather than giving up halfway through.
- Nothing is rotting in the background, because there is no second copy to rot.
The businesses AI recommends are not the ones with a clever extra file. They are the ones with a single, trustworthy site that says the same true thing to a customer and a machine alike.NextAura
None of this means the AI search shift is hype you can ignore. It is real, it is growing, and being named by the assistant a customer asks is becoming as valuable as ranking on the old results page. The point is narrower and more useful: the way to win it is to make your one real site excellent and legible, not to bolt a fragile second version onto the side and hope the bots prefer it. If someone is quoting you for an AI only mirror of your website, that is the conversation to slow down and question.
This is exactly the work we do at NextAura. We handle your SEO and AI search end to end, which means making the one site you already have clean, fast, accurate and trustworthy enough that AI engines read it correctly and name you, without selling you a second version to maintain. If you would rather have someone who tracks what actually moves the needle in AI search, and what is just being sold, get in touch and we will take it from here while you get back to your customers.